CBR Values Test
INTRODUCTION:
Three
Soil sample has supplied for investigation
to ascertain the physical and engineering properties along with proctor value and CBR values table for the purpose of construction.
OBJECTIVE:
This report describes the finding of sub-soil
investigation and laboratory tests conducted on these soil samples and the data
required for purpose.
LABORATORY INVESTIGATION:
For
proper identification & classification of the sub-soil strata and for
deriving adequate information regarding its relevant Geo-technical properties
of the site under investigation, the following laboratory tests were conducted
on the soil samples collected from boreholes-
v GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS AS PER IS: 2720, part-IV
·
SIEVE ANALYSIS
The complete
sieve analysis can be divided
into two parts, i.e,
the coarse analysis
and fine analysis. An oven dried
samples of soil is separated into two fractions by sieving it through a4.75 mm
IS sieve. The portion retained of it (+4.75mm size) is termed as the gravel fraction and is kept
for the coarse
analysis, while the
portion passing through
it (-4.75mm size) is subjected to fine sieve analysis.
·
HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
In the
wet method of
mechanical analysis or
sedimentation analysis, the
soil fraction, finer than 75 micron size is kept in
suspension in a liquid (usually water) medium. The analysis is based on stake's law, according to which the velocity at which grains settle out of
suspension, all other factor
being equal, is
depended upon the
shape, weight and
size of the particles/grains
v SOIL CONSISTENCY AS PER IS: 2720, part-V
These are
arbitrary moisture contents to
determine the instant
at which the
soil is on the
verge of being viscous liquid (Liquid limit) or non–plastic /Plastic limit.
Liquid limits determined with the help of a liquid limit apparatus. Plastic
limit is the water content at which the soil begins to crumble when rolled out
into a thin thread of 3mm
v MOISTURE CONTENT AS PER IS: 2720, part-IX
It
is the ratio of the weight of water to the dry weight of soil determined by
oven drying
v DRY DENSITY AND BULK DENSITYAS PER IS:
2720, part-IX
These were
determined by measuring
the weights and
dimensions of tri-axial
shear and unconfined compressive
strength test samples before testing and after oven drying. The bulk density
& dry density values of the samples have been given in the enclosed
laboratory sheet.
v SPECIFIC GRAVITY AS PER IS: 2720, part-III
The
Specific Gravity of the soil samples was determined by adopting standard
procedure. The soil sample was dried in oven dried for 24 hours and pulverized.
The sample was then poured into a specific gravity bottle and topped up with
distilled water. The specific gravity bottle was stirred and heated to
eliminate air bubbles. The weight of the
specific gravity bottle was recorded along with the temperature of the sample.
v DETERMINATION
OF C.B.R VALUE:
Three(03)
nos. of samples has supplied from construction area by the client to find out
the proctor density and CBR value.
·
PROCTOR TEST &
CALIFORNIA BEARING RATIO TEST (CBR):
Proctor
test is done by using standard proctor mold. Dried soil sample mixed with
small quantity of water is kept in the mold and compacted by using standard
rammer in three layer with 25 blows on each layer and weight , moisture content
are taken. This process is repeated with increasing quantity of water till
weight is decreases. After plotting the reading in the graph get the OMC and
Maximum dry density.
For
CBR test the sample are compacted in CBR mold and kept under water for 96
hours in soft condition. Later on it is tested on CBR apparatus. The load
readings are recorded at penetration 0.00mm, 1.00mm, 1.50mm, 2.00mm, 2.50mm,
3.00mm, 4.00mm, 5.00mm, 7.50mm, 10.00mm and 12.50mm. The penetration curves are
plotted in graph and CBR value is calculated for penetration of 2.50mm, 5.00mm
and 7.50mm.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE
SOIL SAMPLE:
The borehole log
and particle size distribution curves reveal the following underlying sub-soil
strata as per IS: 1498 specification below the investigation area-
Sample
–I/SS-I:
Brownish to
Greyish/light greyishcolouredsilty clay, impervious, low compressibility,
sticky, medium plasticity, low compressibility, impervious layer, fair to
moderate in consistency, traces of non-plastic silt, saturated, inorganic,
cohesive soil
Sample-II/SS-II:
Light Brownish
Ash/light Brownish colouredpoorly graded sand mixed with non-plastic silt,
traces of non-plastic silt and dust mica and clay binder in some layer, fairly
moderate to dense in compactness, inorganic, cohesion less soil
GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION & SOIL CONSISTENCY PARAMETER
(As
per IS: 2720, Part-IV&Part-V)
Sample No
|
Particle Size Distribution |
Atterberg
Limits |
Shrinkage Limit |
Free
swelling Index (%) |
Permeability
(cm/Sec) |
||||||
Clay
|
Silt
|
Sand
|
Gravels
|
IS Classification |
Liquid limit (%) |
Plastic limit (%) |
Plastic Index (%) |
||||
SS-I |
21.00 |
64.00 |
15.00 |
0.00 |
CI |
38.4 |
24.1 |
14.3 |
--- |
10.91 |
--- |
SS-II |
4.00 |
49.00 |
47.00 |
0.00 |
SM |
--- |
--- |
--- |
--- |
--- |
--- |
MOISTURE
CONTENT, DENSITIES, SPECIFIC GRAVITY VOID RATIO, SHEAR & CONSOLIDATION
PARAMETERS
(As
per IS: 2720, Part-III &Part-IX, Part-XI, Part-XII, Part-XIII &
Part-XV)
Sample No
|
In-Situ Properties of Soil |
Shear parameter |
Consolidation parameter |
U.C.C in t/m2 |
||||||
Moisture Content in % |
Bulk Density in t/m3 |
Dry Density in t/m3 |
Specific Gravity |
VoidRatio |
Cohesion in t/m2 |
f in degree |
Cc |
Av |
||
SS-I |
19.026 |
1.934 |
1.625 |
2.619 |
0.612 |
--- |
--- |
--- |
--- |
--- |
SS-II |
14.602 |
1.929 |
1.683 |
2.630 |
0.562 |
--- |
--- |
--- |
--- |
--- |
PROCTOR COMPACTION TEST& CALIFORNIA
BEARING RATIO TEST (CBR)
Sample No |
Sand Content In % |
Proctor Test |
CBR Test |
CBR Value In % |
Average CBR value In % |
|||
O.M.C In % |
M.D.D In gm/cc |
Proctor value |
2.5mm Penetration |
5.0mm Penetration |
|
|
||
SS-I |
15.00 |
18.65 |
1.74 |
91.8% |
4.69 |
4.09 |
4.69 |
--- |
SS-II |
47.00 |
15.0 |
1.76 |
94.5% |
5.35 |
4.66 |
5.35 |
--- |
SUITABILITY OF EXISTING SOIL FOR FILLING
PURPOSES:
Having
seen the engineering properties of these soils,we shall now assess their
suitability as backfilling as follows-
·
Sample
No-2 (SS-II),Soil is generally fine sand mixed with
non-plastic silt and swelling characteristics does not arise. The compaction
test results performed on selected supplied soil samples indicate the maximum
dry density value 1.76gm/c3 and optimum moisture contents varying between 15.0%.
CBR tests were carried out at the optimum moisture contents and maximum dry
density obtained from the compaction tests performed. The CBR values at 2.5 mm
penetration vary from 4.66% to 5.35%.The CBR test results indicate that in-situ
soil is having good compaction properties for the sub-grade. Based on soil
properties, this soil is recommended for as good for earth filling all type
construction.
·
Sample
No-1 (SS-I), Soil is generally fine silty clay mixed
with non-plastic silt and swelling characteristics under marginal value. The
compaction test results performed on selected supplied soil samples indicate the
maximum dry density value 1.74gm/c3 and optimum moisture contents varying
between 1865%. CBR tests were carried out at the optimum moisture contents and
maximum dry density obtained from the compaction tests performed. The CBR
values at 2.5 mm penetration vary from 4.09% to 4.69%.The CBR test results
indicate that in-situ soil is having fairly good compaction properties for the
sub-grade. Based on soil properties, this soil is recommended for as fairly good
for earth filling all type construction
Comments
Post a Comment